Contra Costa County · June 2, 2026

Vote NO on Measure G

The Contra Costa Community College District wants $920 million in new debt — more than all three previous bond measures combined — while enrollment has fallen 28% since 2002.

See the Arguments →
$920M in new principal · $963M in new interest · $1.88B total repayment · Final payoff 2059 · Enrollment down 28% since 2002 · No senior exemption · $1,623 more per Contra Costa resident · Chancellor paid more than Governor Newsom · $920M in new principal · $963M in new interest · $1.88B total repayment · Final payoff 2059 · Enrollment down 28% since 2002 · No senior exemption · $1,623 more per Contra Costa resident · Chancellor paid more than Governor Newsom ·
$920M New debt — principal only
$1.88B Total repayment with interest
$2.61B Total bonded debt if Measure G passes
2059 Year of final Measure G payment
21,940 Actual full-time equivalent students (2024–25)

Already Deeply in Debt

The Contra Costa Community College District has already passed three bond measures. Taxpayers are still paying on all three.

Over the past two decades, 4CD has issued bonds totaling $856.5 million in principal alone — and Contra Costa County property owners still owe nearly $727 million including interest, with the final payment on the 2014 Measure E bond not due until 2039.

Bond Measure Year Principal Status
Measure A 2002 $120 million Still paying
Measure A 2006 $286.5 million Still paying
Measure E 2014 $450 million Payoff 2039
Total existing debt $856.5 million $727M still owed
Measure G NEW 2026 $920 million Payoff 2059

Measure G alone — $920 million in principal — is greater than the sum of all three previous bond measures combined.

With interest, Measure G's total repayment reaches $1.88 billion. Combined with existing debt, total bonded indebtedness would reach $2.61 billion, with Contra Costa County's assessed property values as collateral.

What Does It Cost Each Taxpayer?

4CD advertises Measure G as adding only $10 per $100,000 of assessed property value. But that framing relies on a 33-year repayment window to make a massive bill appear small. And it doesn't tell the whole story:

The Bottom Line

Under Measure G, every Contra Costa County resident — including seniors on fixed incomes — would owe an additional $1,623 per capita to bond underwriters and banks ($1.88 billion ÷ 1,158,225 residents).

The "50,000 Students" Myth

4CD claims "nearly 50,000 students" attend its three colleges. That figure is deliberately misleading — it counts anyone who registers for even a single course.

California's actual funding metric — and the honest measure of institutional size — is Full Time Equivalent Students (FTES). One FTES equals 525 instructional hours (15 hours × 35 weeks). By this standard, 4CD enrollment has collapsed.

4CD Full-Time Equivalent Students (FTES) — at Time of Each Bond Measure
2002 (Msr A)
30,648
Bond passed
2006 (Msr A)
~28,200
2014 (Msr E)
28,367
Bond passed
2024–25
21,940
▼ 28% since 2002

Source: State Chancellor's Full-Time Equivalent Student (FTES) Report, October 30, 2025. View report (p. 9)

When 4CD passed its first bond in 2002, it served 30,648 full-time equivalent students. Today it serves only 21,940 — a drop of nearly 9,000 students, or 28%.

Yet the district now wants to borrow $920 million to build expensive new facilities. Adding costly new construction while enrollment trends sharply downward is exactly the wrong approach.

4CD's own Facilities Plans show extensive new construction planned at all three colleges. As in struggling K-12 systems: building lavish new facilities while enrollment falls does not serve students — it serves construction contractors and the unions that back Project Stabilization Agreements.

Deferred Maintenance: A Recurring Excuse

"Deferred maintenance" projects — roofing, seismic retrofits, electrical, HVAC — appear over and over in 4CD bond project summaries dating back to 2002. If three bond measures totaling $856.5 million haven't resolved basic maintenance needs, why should voters believe a fourth will?

The answer may lie in spending priorities. Over the last decade, 4CD's maintenance budget has crept from just 0.10% to 0.20% of Plant Replacement Value. The standard for commercial buildings is 2–5%. The district spends a fraction of what responsible building management requires — then asks taxpayers to cover the gap through bonds.

Generous Salaries, Lean Maintenance

While 4CD defers routine building maintenance and seeks bond funds to cover the gap, its administrative compensation is lavish. The district's chancellor is paid more than the Governor of California.

Position Max Total Compensation
Chancellor $548,112
Vice Chancellors $400,274
College Presidents $367,794
Counselors $350,777
Associate Vice Chancellors $321,244
Deans $316,221
Directors $310,077
Vice Presidents $307,054

Figures represent maximum total compensation (salary + benefits) as of 2024. Governor Newsom's salary for comparison: $245,929.

Official Arguments Against Measure G

The following arguments were submitted for the official ballot pamphlet by the No on Measure G committee.

Primary Argument Against Measure G

Measure G: far too much, far too soon.

The Contra Costa Community College District (4CD) passed three bonds prior to Measure G: Measure A (2002, $120 million); another Measure A (2006, $286.5 million); and Measure E (2014, $450 million). Those three measures totaled $856.5 million in principal alone.

Bonds are loans, paid back with interest. We're still paying on all three prior bonds. That remaining payback obligation, including interest, is still nearly $727 million, with Measure E's final payment scheduled for 2039.

Now comes Measure G, adding $920 million more — greater than the sum total of all three previous bonds. With interest, Measure G's total repayment reaches $1.88 billion, by 2059. Adding earlier measures, total bonded indebtedness would reach $2.61 billion, with Contra Costa County's assessed property values as collateral.

Until Measure E's 2039 payoff, 4CD bond taxes already average $13.97 per $100,000 of assessed value. Measure G would add $10 to that — and continue on its own long past 2039. 4CD's tax rate estimates are based on 4% annual property value growth and are, by the district's own required disclosure, "not binding upon 4CD."

Under Measure G, Contra Costa County residents — with no senior exemption — would owe an additional $1,623 per capita to bond underwriters and banks.

4CD should rely less on successive large bond measures and more on its existing budget to maintain its existing buildings.

Rebuttal Argument Against Measure G

4CD is already deeply in debt. Three previous bond measures totaled $856.5 million in principal. Including interest, county taxpayers still owe nearly $727 million, with final payoff in 2039.

4CD's claim of "nearly 50,000 students" is highly misleading — it includes single-course enrollees. California's funding metric is Full Time Equivalent Students (FTES). When 2002's bond passed, FTES was 30,648. By 2014, it was 28,367. In 2024–25, it was only 21,940.

Adding expensive new facilities while enrollment trends sharply downward is ill-advised. Yet Measure G intends $920 million in new principal — plus $963 million in interest — with final payoff in 2059.

How many bond measures will it take to complete the same fundamental "deferred maintenance" projects — roofing repairs, seismic retrofits, electrical, HVAC — that appear over and over in 4CD's bond summaries?

4CD's "Project Stabilization Agreements" — exclusive union construction contracts granted in exchange for no-strike promises — increase costs. Bond measures like Measure G have no senior exemption.

With shrinking enrollments: instead of building plush new facilities with new borrowed millions, 4CD should maintain existing buildings in better condition, with existing money.

Who We Are

This effort is a project of the Contra Costa Taxpayers Association (CoCoTax) and community members who believe the district should practice fiscal responsibility before asking taxpayers for nearly a billion dollars in new debt.

Denise Kalm
President Pro Tem, Contra Costa Taxpayers Association
Jeff Black
Corporate Financial Analyst, Retired; Former School Facilities Oversight Committee Member, Danville School Bond Oversight
Michael Arata
Industrial Consultant, Retired; Former Chemistry Instructor and Swim Coach
Taiwo Abugan
MBA, CPA; Senior Assistant Corporate Vice President; Local Member, Danville School Bond Oversight Committee
Luis Cornejo
Independent Contractor, Pittsburg

Election date: June 2, 2026. Contra Costa County is a vote-by-mail jurisdiction. Ballots will be mailed to all registered voters before election day.

To learn more or get involved, visit cocotax.org.